Main results page       Back to Bridge Victoria main site

TUESDAY - SECTION A (23-JUL-19)

Pair 4 NS - PETER HARKIN / HELENE HARKIN
Place: 2, Percentage: 58.96%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	2: JAN VAN RIEL / MARGARET GRANT	4 N	4H	11	450	4	50%
Board 2	2: JAN VAN RIEL / MARGARET GRANT	4 N	TD	12	680	7	88%
Board 3	2: JAN VAN RIEL / MARGARET GRANT	1NT E	4C	8	-120	4	50%
Board 4	2: JAN VAN RIEL / MARGARET GRANT	2 N	KD	9	140	5	62%
Board 5	2: JAN VAN RIEL / MARGARET GRANT	3NT E	5C	10	-430	1.5	19%
Board 6	1: LYNDA ANDREWS / IAN ANDREWS	2 E	KC	8	-110	2	25%
Board 7	1: LYNDA ANDREWS / IAN ANDREWS	4 N	AD	9	-100	3	38%
Board 8	1: LYNDA ANDREWS / IAN ANDREWS	4 W	3D	10	-420	3	38%
Board 9	1: LYNDA ANDREWS / IAN ANDREWS	3 W	3D	7	200	4	50%
Board 10	1: LYNDA ANDREWS / IAN ANDREWS	3 W	5C	9	-140	4	50%
Board 11	5: KENNETH GREIG / PETER WICKHAM	2 E	QH	9	-140	0	0%
Board 12	5: KENNETH GREIG / PETER WICKHAM	2 S	KD	9	140	8	100%
Board 13	5: KENNETH GREIG / PETER WICKHAM	3 E	TD	7	200	8	100%
Board 14	5: KENNETH GREIG / PETER WICKHAM	4NT N	AS	10	430	6	75%
Board 15	5: KENNETH GREIG / PETER WICKHAM	4 S	AC	9	-100	5.7	71%
Board 16	4: MERLE GASKELL / MARIAN FINKELSTEIN	3NT N	4H	11	460	7	88%
Board 17	4: MERLE GASKELL / MARIAN FINKELSTEIN	2 W	2C	6	100	8	100%
Board 18	4: MERLE GASKELL / MARIAN FINKELSTEIN	1NT W	AH	7	-90	5	62%
Board 19	4: MERLE GASKELL / MARIAN FINKELSTEIN	4 S	QC	9	-50	6	75%
Board 20	4: MERLE GASKELL / MARIAN FINKELSTEIN	1 E	7H	11	-200	7.8	98%
Board 21	3: JO QUINLIVAN / SIMONE WHITEMAN	3 W	4S	8	50	8	100%
Board 22	3: JO QUINLIVAN / SIMONE WHITEMAN	3 W	5D	8	100	1	12%
Board 23	3: JO QUINLIVAN / SIMONE WHITEMAN	4 N	3D	9	-100	2	25%
Board 24	3: JO QUINLIVAN / SIMONE WHITEMAN	2NT E	5S	8	-120	0	0%
Board 25	3: JO QUINLIVAN / SIMONE WHITEMAN	2NT E	3H	6	200	8	100%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results